REIMAGINING MEDICAID PROGRAM INTEGRITY FOR A NEW ERA

Medicaid is one of the most complex and consequential public programs in the country. Every day, state agencies and managed care organizations determine eligibility, adjudicate millions of claims, coordinate benefits, and ensure access to essential services for vulnerable populations.

As fiscal conditions tighten and oversight intensifies, the margin for payment error continues to shrink. Strengthening Medicaid program integrity is no longer simply a compliance function—it is central to protecting limited resources, preserving benefits, and sustaining public confidence in the program.

When executed effectively, integrity efforts do not restrict care. They stabilize and protect it.

Integrity as a System Strength

Medicaid program integrity is the system’s ability to pay accurately, administer efficiently, and ensure funds are directed to eligible individuals and appropriate providers. It reflects disciplined operations—not distrust.

Improper payments remain the federal government’s primary measurement tool for payment accuracy. Yet most improper payments are not fraud. They stem from documentation gaps, eligibility timing mismatches, incomplete third-party liability (TPL) information, or administrative process breakdowns.

The Medicaid environment is uniquely susceptible to these issues due to:

• Frequent eligibility redeterminations

• Income volatility among beneficiaries

• Household composition changes

• Layered federal and state requirements

• Coordination with other public and commercial coverage

Without timely, reliable data and flexible systems, even well-managed programs face exposure to preventable errors.

The solution lies in building integrity into the workflow—not layering it on after payment.

Moving from Recovery to Prevention

Historically, many Medicaid integrity efforts have centered on post-payment recovery. While recovery plays an important role, it is inherently reactive and often inefficient. Recovery rates frequently represent only a fraction of the original improper payment, and the administrative burden can be substantial.

A prevention-first model delivers stronger results.

Three core strategies are driving measurable improvements across states:

1. Real-Time Verification and Data Connectivity

Automated data exchange across trusted federal and state systems reduces reliance on manual verification and self-reported information. Secure integrations can validate eligibility factors, confirm identity, and detect conflicting coverage before a claim is finalized.

When verification occurs upstream, agencies minimize downstream disruption—including appeals, recoupments, and retroactive eligibility corrections.

Improved data quality leads to cleaner claims, fewer reversals, and greater predictability.

2. Targeted Technology for Third-Party Liability Prevention

One of the largest sources of preventable Medicaid overpayments is undetected commercial coverage. As the payer of last resort, Medicaid must defer payment when other health insurance (OHI) exists. When that coverage goes unidentified, improper payments occur—even when no fraud is involved.

Modern cost-avoidance platforms address this vulnerability directly.

Syrtis Solutions developed ProTPL, a near-real-time OHI discovery platform designed specifically for Medicaid agencies and managed care organizations. By integrating into claims workflows and executing live HIPAA 270/271 eligibility transactions, ProTPL identifies active commercial coverage before claims are paid.

Rather than relying on outdated batch files, self-disclosure, or retrospective audits, the platform supports prospective prevention. This approach:

• Increases OHI discovery rates

• Reduces reliance on low-yield “pay-and-chase” recovery

• Strengthens compliance with payer-of-last-resort requirements

• Preserves funds for beneficiary care

By preventing improper payments at the point of adjudication, agencies convert integrity into immediate fiscal protection.

3. Intelligent Automation and Risk Prioritization

Artificial intelligence and advanced analytics are enhancing program integrity teams’ ability to identify risk patterns. These tools can:

• Flag inconsistencies in eligibility data

• Prioritize high-risk claims for review

• Monitor provider billing anomalies

• Detect systemic trends across programs

When deployed responsibly, automation increases speed and precision while allowing experienced staff to focus on complex cases that require judgment and oversight.

Aligning Integrity with Access

Some stakeholders worry that stronger oversight may complicate access for eligible individuals. In reality, early prevention reduces administrative friction.

When errors are caught before payment:

• Beneficiaries face fewer retroactive terminations

• Providers experience fewer recoupments

• Appeals and disputes decline

• Administrative workloads decrease

Savings generated from improved payment accuracy can be reinvested into faster enrollment processing, enhanced outreach, and improved service delivery.

Integrity and access reinforce one another when systems are designed correctly.

The Fiscal Imperative

As states navigate constrained budgets and heightened federal oversight, incremental improvements in improper payment rates translate into significant financial stabilization. Even a one-percent improvement can represent tens of millions of dollars preserved in many states.

Beyond dollars saved, strong program integrity demonstrates accountability. Legislators, taxpayers, and oversight bodies expect measurable stewardship of public funds. Transparent, data-driven integrity efforts strengthen the credibility of Medicaid programs and protect their long-term viability.

A Strategic Path Forward

Medicaid integrity should not be treated as a compliance checklist—it should be embraced as a core operational capability. Agencies that invest in real-time verification, modern technology, and proactive cost-avoidance tools position themselves to:

• Reduce preventable improper payments

• Lower administrative recovery costs

• Improve budget predictability

• Protect critical services without reducing benefits

In an era of fiscal pressure and heightened accountability, prevention is protection.

By embedding accuracy into every stage of the eligibility and claims lifecycle, Medicaid leaders can safeguard both public resources and beneficiary access—ensuring the program remains strong, stable, and sustainable for the millions who rely on it.

Click and read more. https://www.syrtissolutions.com/strengthening-medicaid-program-integrity/

JANUARY MEDICAID PROGRAM INTEGRITY SNAPSHOT

 

Syrtis Solutions’ monthly Medicaid mailer provides a focused look at the policy and operational changes influencing payment accuracy and program integrity. Below is a snapshot of notable Medicaid developments from the last month.

Read more here. 

ADDRESSING MEDICAID BUDGET PRESSURE WITHOUT REDUCING BENEFITS

As states prepare their fiscal year (FY) 2027 Medicaid budgets, financial flexibility is becoming increasingly limited. State revenue growth has slowed, healthcare costs continue to climb, and federal policy changes enacted through the 2025 budget reconciliation law have altered how future funding risk is managed. Even as enrollment stabilizes, Medicaid spending remains on an upward trajectory, driven by higher clinical complexity, increased utilization of long-term services and supports, rising pharmacy expenditures, and expanded behavioral health needs.

In this environment, states are revisiting familiar cost-containment strategies. Proposals to reduce provider reimbursement, narrow optional benefits, or tighten utilization controls are once again entering budget conversations. While these measures can reduce spending in the short term, they often introduce downstream challenges—including access limitations, provider participation concerns, and outcomes that conflict with CMS’s emphasis on coverage stability and care quality. As financial pressure grows, Medicaid agencies and managed care organizations (MCOs) are increasingly seeking alternatives that protect budgets without undermining benefits.

Improper Payments Now Carry Direct Budget Risk

One of the most significant shifts affecting Medicaid finances is the heightened consequence of payment errors. Improper payments above the federal 3 percent threshold now result in concrete funding penalties, regardless of whether states later recover the dollars. Federal matching funds may be reduced for any excess over the benchmark, with fewer opportunities for exceptions or mitigation.

This framework fundamentally changes the role of recovery. Post-payment collections no longer shield states from financial exposure or help preserve future funding. A payment made incorrectly remains improper under federal standards—even if it is later recouped—making prevention the only reliable way to manage risk.

Moving Beyond “Pay and Chase”

A large portion of Medicaid improper payments occur when claims should have been paid by another insurer. Traditional recovery-based approaches identify these issues only after funds have been disbursed, offering little benefit in reducing improper payment rates.

Prospective cost avoidance addresses this challenge by stopping errors before they occur. Real-time identification of other health insurance and third-party liability ensures Medicaid consistently acts as the payer of last resort. Each avoided improper payment directly supports compliance with the 3 percent standard and preserves funding for covered services.

Operational Accuracy Drives Financial Stability

Administrative inefficiencies often compound budget challenges. Manual claims review, fragmented eligibility systems, and delayed coverage verification increase error rates while adding operational cost.

By automating eligibility checks, coverage validation, and claims workflows, Medicaid programs and MCOs can improve accuracy while reducing administrative burden. Operational modernization enables compliance with federal standards without shifting costs onto providers or beneficiaries.

Program Integrity as a Budget Strategy

Program integrity has become a central component of fiscal management rather than a retrospective compliance exercise. Continuous monitoring, data-driven oversight, and early risk detection allow states to prevent recurring payment issues before they escalate.

When paired with prospective cost avoidance, these efforts reduce financial leakage, improve audit preparedness, and support long-term budget sustainability—even during periods of economic uncertainty.

Protecting Coverage Through Prevention

As Medicaid budgets face increasing pressure, benefit reductions should remain a last-resort option. The most effective way to prepare for funding constraints is to ensure claims are paid correctly the first time.

Preventing improper payments, maintaining compliance with the federal 3 percent standard, and modernizing operational processes allow states and MCOs to preserve access to care while safeguarding limited resources. In today’s Medicaid environment, cost avoidance is not optional—it is essential to sustaining program integrity and financial stability.

Discover more. 

MEDICAID 2025: LEGISLATION, INNOVATION, AND OVERSIGHT

Syrtis Solutions’ year-end Medicaid recap provides a clear snapshot of 2025’s most significant developments. Topics include program integrity, coordination of benefits, third-party liability, and efforts to combat fraud, waste, and abuse.

Read more here. 

KEY MEDICAID NEWS – DECEMBER 2025 RECAP

 

Stay informed with Syrtis Solutions' monthly Medicaid news summary! Each month, we bring you the latest updates on Medicaid program integrity, cost avoidance, coordination of benefits, and efforts to combat fraud, waste, and abuse. Our roundup highlights key policy changes, research insights, and legislative developments impacting the Medicaid landscape. Here’s a look at last month’s most important Medicaid news.

Learn more here.