MEDICAID SPENDING TO EXCEED MORE THAN $1 TRILLION ANNUALLY

Over the past decade, Medicaid has turned into one of the fastest and largest growing items on state budgets. In 2015, the program made up 20 percent of state budget spending and in 2018 it had grown to 30 percent. Last month, a report from the Foundation of Government Accountability found that Medicaid had cost states over $603 billion in 2018. Moving forward states need to ensure eligibility and address fraud, waste, and abuse in the Medicaid program to decrease costs and protect the program's resources.

The FGA points out that, "ultimately, this means fewer dollars are available for education, corrections, transportation, and other important budget priorities." For example, as Medicaid has expanded, state education spending has dropped by 13 percent and items outside of core budget items have decreased by 12 percent.

In Ohio, Missouri, and Pennsylvania, Medicaid spending has reached as high as 40 percent of their budgets.

The report reveals that in Ohio, Medicaid spending increased 260 percent in eighteen years. In 2000, its Medicaid budget made up 19 percent ($7.3 billion) of the entire budget. Nine years later, it rose to 24 percent ($14 billion) and in 2018 it's grown to 38 percent ($27 billion). That is more than the state's entire general revenue in 2000.

Likewise, Louisiana spent $3.4 billion on Medicaid in 2000 and by 2009 it nearly doubled to $6.2 billion. Three years after program expansion under the Affordable Care Act, Louisiana's Medicaid budget grew again to over $11 billion in 2018. Presently, Medicaid spending in the state sits at 35 percent of the budget. The report cites Medicaid expansion as part of the problem claiming it "has blown the lid off of every state and third-party cost and enrollment projection."

The FGA predicts that in the next ten years Medicaid spending will exceed more than $1 trillion each year.

Nicholas Horton is the author of the report and research director at the FGA. He stated, "States are watching their Medicaid spending climb to extraordinary levels. Hopefully, state leaders will continue to recognize the need to rein in their Medicaid programs and implement commonsense reforms like work requirements and Medicaid expansion enrollment freezes."

The study also includes suggestions geared towards protecting Medicaid's integrity and freeing up resources for other important budget items. One of which is to implement work requirements for non-disabled adults enrolled in Medicaid. The FGA points out that there is evidence that this would aid beneficiaries in becoming more self-sufficient and less dependent on the state.

Groups in opposition to work requirements, like the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), argue that they would limit the access to care for people who rely on it.

According to the CBPP, "State proposals for Medicaid work requirements will cause many low-income adults to lose health coverage, including people who are working or are unable to work due to mental illness, opioid or other substance use disorders, or serious chronic physical conditions, but who can not overcome various bureaucratic hurdles to document that they either meet work requirements or qualify for an exemption from them."

Apart from work requirements, the report also advised that states make a concentrated effort to deal with fraud. The National Bureau of Economic Research found that over 500,000 people enrolled in the program as a result of expansion were ineligible because of their income. The study also mentioned that the states evaluated only represented 25 percent of the 37 states to expand Medicaid and that the number of ineligible members could be as much as three times more.

Improper payments have also been an enormous cost to the program in the last ten years. In the FY 2018 HHS Agency Financial Report the department discovered that Medicaid improper payments totaled $36.25 billion. DHHS recommended incorporating IT solutions at the state level to address the waste. They feel that by making use of technology solutions, Medicaid will have a more comprehensive data structure and improved oversight.

The Medicaid program is costing states billions of dollars and over the next ten years, that figure will climb to $1 trillion. As it expands, it is also pulling away from other necessary budget items such as education, infrastructure, transportation, and corrections. To remain fiscally solvent while providing healthcare to low-income people, state officials and plan administrators must implement reform and present-day technology solutions.

Continue reading here.

BILLIONS LOST AS A RESULT OF IMPROPER MEDICAID PAYMENTS

Medicaid is losing billions of dollars from improper payments. According to HHS Agency Financial Reports, improper Medicaid payments reached $30 billion in 2015 and grew to nearly $37 billion in 2017. The vast majority of these improper payments were determined to be improper claims payments due to data errors.

The federal government often points out such substantial figures as evidence of prevalent fraud, waste, and abuse that purportedly is present in federal government health care programs. Yet in point of fact, a 2013 HHS-OIG report presents some much needed perspective, pointing out that 57 percent of the "improper" Medicaid payments originate from more commonplace, routine issues, involving the "eligibility errors" that occur when a patient moves from one state to another and doesn't provide Medicaid with a change of address. Fraud in the Medicaid program may well still be a dramatic problem, but when "improper payments" are the outcome of such "eligibility errors" instead of fraud, the true scope of the challenge can better be recognized.

With the increased awareness that government officials have paid to the need for accurate Medicaid claims information within federal government healthcare systems, one may have expected that now, nearly five years since an inspector general testified that much of the data used to identify improper payments and fraud is not "current, available, complete, [or] accurate", the issues would certainly be tended to and the federal government's records rendered more reliable.

In a statement to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Carolyn Yocom, GAO Health Care Director mentioned, "despite efforts to reduce improper payments in the Medicaid program by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which oversees the program, overall improper payments continue to increase."

The climb in improper payments can be contributed to the large size of the program and unsatisfactory oversight. Director Yocom testified that Medicaid has been on the list of high-risk programs dating back to 2003 and that its oversight is insufficient. She stated, "the size and complexity of Medicaid make the program particularly vulnerable to improper payments-- including payments made for people not eligible for Medicaid or made for services not actually provided."

The GAO characterizes an improper payment as "any payment that should not have been made or that was made in an incorrect amount (including overpayments and underpayments) under statutory, contractual, administrative, or other legally applicable requirements. Reducing improper payments-- such as payments to ineligible recipients or duplicate payments-- is critical to safeguarding federal funds, but the federal government has consistently been unable to determine the full extent of improper payments and whether its actions to reduce them are appropriate."

Improper payments also consist of:

• Any payment made in error when the payment was the liability of a third party
• Any payment to an ineligible recipient
• Any payment for an ineligible service
• Any duplicative payment
• Payment for services not received (except where authorized by law).
• Any payment that does not account for credit for applicable discounts.

In a two-year time span, improper Medicaid payments have risen by $8 billion dollars. This is an obvious sign the program does not have effective oversight. To preserve the vital federal-state health insurance program and safeguard taxpayer dollars, the complications that develop from poor eligibility data within the Medicaid program must be resolved.

Read more here.